In my old thread over on Banana Republic, Milligan wrote:

How many forensic document experts examined OB BC?
Can’t rely on factcheck.org experts….conflict of interest here.

Kevmoron replied:

None. Because Obama hasn’t offered the document for examination. But there have been Technical Guys that have examined the electronic version offered on Obama’s FightTheSmears website and they’ve determined it to be a forgery. One of the premium examiners is the freeper Polarik.

And over on pissant’s thread, TheNewPundit wrote (in part) to Polarik:

You claim that no one has refuted your evidence, yet your evidence wouldn’t hold water in a court of law.

To this, Kevmoron replied:

It’s already holding water in a court of law, Berg Vs. Obama. The judge has not thrown out the lawsuit as trivial because the evidence is strong enough to consider.

The evidence is strong enough to consider?

What a rube Kevmoron is.

The “evidence” with regard to the COLB presented in Berg’s case is the “evidence” of the infamous Techdude. On his website Berg says:

My deepest thanks and appreciation our forensic analyst’s unwavering commitment to the truth despite the threats and harassment, the slashed tires and the dead animal on his porch.

The analyst is an active member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, American College of Forensic Examiners, The International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, International Information Systems Forensics Association – the list goes on. He also a board certified as a forensic computer examiner, a certificated legal investigator, and a licensed private investigator. He has been performing computer based forensic investigations since 1993 (although back then it did not even have a formal name yet) and he has performed countless investigations since then.

Yup. That’s Techdude alright.

The same Techdude who was exposed as a fraud. The same Techdude who was found to have been fabricating his “evidence.” The same Techdude whose articles were pulled off both TexasDarlin and NoQuarter because even they could no longer deny that they had been duped.

And if Kevmoron doesn’t believe me, he can take it up with the “premium examiner” Polarik, who just this past Sunday over on Atlas Shrugs said this:

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but TechDude is a liar and a fraud who fabricated evidence, and outright stole the ideas of others.

So much for the case not having been thrown out because the “evidence is strong enough to consider.” The case wasn’t thrown out because Berg did not exercise due diligence and fed the judge a steaming pile of fraudulent bullshit. Something the judge will not be made aware of until after the defendants have been served and their motions to dismiss have been filed.

k

Advertisements